Energy Limits to the Computational Power of the Human Brain
by Ralph C. Merkle
This article first appeared in Foresight Update No. 6, August
A related article on the memory capacity of the human brain
available on the web.
The Brain as a Computer
The view that the brain can be seen as a type of computer
has gained general
acceptance in the philosophical and computer science community.
Just as we
ask how many mips or megaflops an IBM PC or a Cray can perform,
we can ask
how many operations the human brain can perform. Neither the
mip nor the
megaflop seems quite appropriate, though; we need something new.
possibility is the number of synapse operations per second.
A second possible basic operation is inspired by the observation
propagation is a major limit. As gates become faster, smaller,
simply getting a signal from one gate to another becomes a major
brain couldn't compute if nerve impulses didn't carry information
synapse to the next, and propagating a nerve impulse using the
electrochemical technology of the brain requires a measurable
energy. Thus, instead of measuring synapse operations per second,
measure the total distance that all nerve impulses combined can
second, e.g., total nerve-impulse-distance per second.
There are other ways to estimate the brain's computational
power. We might
count the number of synapses, guess their speed of operation,
synapse operations per second. There are roughly 1015 synapses
about 10 impulses/second , giving roughly 1016 synapse operations
A second approach is to estimate the computational power of
the retina, and
then multiply this estimate by the ratio of brain size to retinal
retina is relatively well understood so we can make a reasonable
its computational power. The output of the retina--carried by
nerve--is primarily from retinal ganglion cells that perform
computations (or related computations of roughly similar complexity).
assume that a typical center surround computation requires about
adds and is done about 100 times per second , then computation
axonal output of each ganglion cell requires about 10,000 analog
second. There are about 1,000,000 axons in the optic nerve [5,
page 21], so
the retina as a whole performs about 1010 analog adds per second.
about 108 nerve cells in the retina [5, page 26], and between
1010 and 1012
nerve cells in the brain [5, page 7], so the brain is roughly
100 to 10,000
times larger than the retina. By this logic, the brain should
be able to do
about 1012 to 1014 operations per second (in good agreement with
estimate of Moravec, who considers this approach in more detail
[4, page 57
The Brain Uses Energy
A third approach is to measure the total energy used by the
second, and then determine the energy used for each basic operation.
Dividing the former by the latter gives the maximum number of
operations per second. We need two pieces of information: the
consumed by the brain each second, and the energy used by a basic
The total energy consumption of the brain is about 25 watts
. Inasmuch as
a significant fraction of this energy will not be used for useful
computation, we can reasonably round this to 10 watts.
Nerve Impulses Use Energy
Nerve impulses are carried by either myelinated or un-myelinated
Myelinated axons are wrapped in a fatty insulating myelin sheath,
interrupted at intervals of about 1 millimeter to expose the
interruptions are called nodes of Ranvier. Propagation of a nerve
a myelinated axon is from one node of Ranvier to the next, jumping
A nerve cell has a resting potential--the outside of the nerve
cell is 0
volts (by definition), while the inside is about -60 millivolts.
more Na+ outside a nerve cell than inside, and this chemical
gradient effectively adds about 50 extra millivolts to the voltage
the Na+ ions, for a total of about 110 millivolts [1, page 15].
When a nerve
impulse passes by, the internal voltage briefly rises above 0
of an inrush of Na+ ions.
The Energy of a Nerve Impulse
Nerve cell membranes have a capacitance of 1 microfarad per
centimeter, so the capacitance of a relatively small 30 square
of Ranvier is 3 x 10-13 farads (assuming small nodes tends to
the computational power of the brain). The internodal region
is about 1,000
microns in length, 500 times longer than the 2 micron node, but
the myelin sheath its capacitance is about 250 times lower per
[5, page 180; 7, page 126] or only twice that of the node. The
capacitance of a single node and internodal gap is thus about
9 x 10-13
farads. The total energy in joules held by such a capacitor at
0.11 volts is
1/2 V2 x C, or 1/2 x 0.112 x 9 x 10-13, or 5 x 10-15 joules.
is discharged and then recharged whenever a nerve impulse passes,
dissipating 5 x 10-15 joules. A 10 watt brain can therefore do
at most 2 x
1015 such Ranvier ops per second. Both larger myelinated fibers
unmyelinated fibers dissipate more energy. Various other factors
considered here increase the total energy per nerve impulse ,
to somewhat overestimate the number of Ranvier ops the brain
can perform. It
still provides a useful upper bound and is unlikely to be in
error by more
than an order of magnitude.
To translate Ranvier ops (1-millimeter jumps) into synapse
must know the average distance between synapses, which is not
in neuroscience texts. We can estimate it: a human can recognize
an image in
about 100 milliseconds, which can take at most 100 one-millisecond
delays. A single signal probably travels 100 millimeters in that
the eye to the back of the brain, and then some). If it passes
in 100 millimeters then it passes one synapse every millimeter--which
one synapse operation is about one Ranvier operation.
Both synapse ops and Ranvier ops are quite low-level. The
analog addition ops seem intuitively more powerful, so it is
surprising that the brain can perform fewer of them.
While the software remains a major challenge, we will soon
be able to build
hardware powerful enough to perform more such operations per
second than can
the human brain. There is already a massively parallel multi-processor
built at IBM Yorktown with a raw computational power of 1012
operations per second: the TF-1. It should be working in 1991
. When we
can build a desktop computer able to deliver 1025 gate operations
and more (as we will surely be able to do with a mature nanotechnology)
when we can write software to take advantage of that hardware
(as we will
also eventually be able to do), a single computer with abilities
to a billion to a trillion human beings will be a reality. If
might today be solved by freeing all humanity from all mundane
concerns, and focusing all their combined intellectual energies
then that problem can be solved in the future by a personal computer.
field will be left unchanged by this staggering increase in our
The total computational power of the brain is limited by several
including the ability to propagate nerve impulses from one place
brain to another. Propagating a nerve impulse a distance of 1
requires about 5 x 10-15 joules. Because the total energy dissipated
brain is about 10 watts, this means nerve impulses can collectively
at most 2 x 1015 millimeters per second. By estimating the distance
synapses we can in turn estimate how many synapse operations
per second the
brain can do. This estimate is only slightly smaller than one
multiplying the estimated number of synapses by the average firing
two orders of magnitude greater than one based on functional
retinal computational power. It seems reasonable to conclude
that the human
brain has a raw computational power between 1013 and 1016 operations
* 1. Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes, by Bertil Hille,
* 2. Principles of Neural Science, by Eric R. Kandel and James
Schwartz, 2nd edition, Elsevier, 1985.
* 3. Tom Binford, private communication.
* 4. Mind Children, by Hans Moravec, Harvard University Press,
* 5. From Neuron to Brain, second edition, by Stephen W. Kuffler,
Nichols, and A. Robert Martin, Sinauer, 1984.
* 6. The switching network of the TF-1 Parallel Supercomputer
by Monty M.
Denneau, Peter H. Hochschild, and Gideon Shichman, Supercomputing,
winter 1988 pages 7-10.
* 7. Myelin, by Pierre Morell, Plenum Press, 1977.
* 8. The production and absorption of heat associated with electrical
activity in nerve and electric organ by J. M. Ritchie and R.
Quarterly Review of Biophysics 18, 4 (1985), pp. 451-476.
The author would like to thank Richard Aldritch, Tom Binford,
Taz Home Page 2
Site search Web search
Hans Moravec, and Irwin Sobel for their comments and their patience
powered by FreeFind